🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has maintained a prohibition on deploying national guard in the Oregon city, following a recent legal decision.

Judicial Panel Agrees to Rehear Case

The federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday that it would rehear the case concerning the president’s authority with an expanded group of eleven justices. The court also vacated a earlier decision from a smaller judicial group that had supported the federal government.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the latest development in a long-running legal battle over whether the administration has the legal right and valid reason to send state military units in the city. Approximately two hundred troops have been in uncertainty since the end of September when the deployment effort was started in response to ongoing demonstrations.

Differing Viewpoints

The federal government has claimed that government employees at the immigration center in south Portland were under attack, while city and state officials assert that local officers have command of the situation.

Contrary to descriptions of the city as a conflict zone, locals have been posting videos of lush hiking trails and a thriving food scene, and planning events such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the increased military presence.

Court Proceedings

The appeals court decision came after a US district judge in the city issued two temporary restraining orders this month – one blocking the federalization of the state troops, and another prohibiting the use of any national guard troops in Oregon, after attempts to circumvent the first order by calling up troops from California.

On Monday, the ninth circuit panel had temporarily suspended the initial decision – permitting command of 200 Oregon national guard – but the second ruling remained in place, blocking the actual deployment of the troops.

En Banc Review

The latest ruling means the matter will be heard “en banc” – with both rulings under review simultaneously – by a group of 11 judges.

“This decision demonstrates that facts are important and that the courts are working to hold this administration accountable. The constitution restricts the president’s power, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a testing site for expansive government power,” stated the state attorney general in a official comment.

“The judicial body is sending a clear message: the executive leader cannot dispatch the armed forces into US cities without cause. We will continue protecting state legislation, values, and autonomy as this legal proceeding progresses and our fight continues in the judicial system.”